Post by ehsanulh125 on Jan 9, 2024 7:00:56 GMT
According to the perhaps most famous thesis of geopolitics, "geography is the key to history". Mackinder is a common phrase in Hungarianof his original writingis not a completely accurate translation, yet it conveys well the system of relations that geopolitics investigates in the trinity of the exercise of power, politics and space. However, while classical geopolitics linked the exercise of power to sovereign states, the practice of politics to the governing elites and identified space as a geographical space, postmodern and critical geopolitical trends have expanded the framework of interpretation: the exercise of power can be connected to both sub- and supranational actors, politics is more it takes place at the same level and in parallel, and in addition to geographical spaces, virtual, cyber or even thought spaces also enter into spatial interpretation.
Within this framework, we Buy Bulk SMS Service can interpret the struggle for control of the thought or emotional space, i.e. the war for hearts and minds. As virtual spaces gain more and more importance in our lives, information warfare creeps into people's mental and emotional spaces as well. This may sound abstract, but many peoplewe could meetduring the past year, for example, with the deep-fake video of the Ukrainian president, in which he called on the population to surrender, with the "Ghost of Kiev" story, which was about a fighter pilot who single-handedly destroyed six Russian military planes, or with the fake BBC logo with coverage that discussed Poland's potential entry into the war. Cyberspace, which is also commonly referred to as the fifth dimension of warfare, not only enables digital threats to the physical world (for example, through hacker attacks, data theft or damage to critical infrastructure), but also opens the way for computer propaganda, which specifically targets the average person.
Fake profiles, manipulated images and recordings, deep-fake videos, and forged documents all serve to support certain narratives. With the advent of social media, news consumers have increasing influence over what information they encounter on a daily basis, which has the potential to distort people's perceptions of news and public affairs trends. The dynamics of social media networks play a decisive role in the social influence of political processes, as they have become not only a forum for political campaigns, but also for information sharing (EPRS, 2019). The ability of news consumers to filter the content that comes their way reduces the likelihood of unplanned, unexpected encounters that represent shared experiences in an otherwise heterogeneous society.
Within this framework, we Buy Bulk SMS Service can interpret the struggle for control of the thought or emotional space, i.e. the war for hearts and minds. As virtual spaces gain more and more importance in our lives, information warfare creeps into people's mental and emotional spaces as well. This may sound abstract, but many peoplewe could meetduring the past year, for example, with the deep-fake video of the Ukrainian president, in which he called on the population to surrender, with the "Ghost of Kiev" story, which was about a fighter pilot who single-handedly destroyed six Russian military planes, or with the fake BBC logo with coverage that discussed Poland's potential entry into the war. Cyberspace, which is also commonly referred to as the fifth dimension of warfare, not only enables digital threats to the physical world (for example, through hacker attacks, data theft or damage to critical infrastructure), but also opens the way for computer propaganda, which specifically targets the average person.
Fake profiles, manipulated images and recordings, deep-fake videos, and forged documents all serve to support certain narratives. With the advent of social media, news consumers have increasing influence over what information they encounter on a daily basis, which has the potential to distort people's perceptions of news and public affairs trends. The dynamics of social media networks play a decisive role in the social influence of political processes, as they have become not only a forum for political campaigns, but also for information sharing (EPRS, 2019). The ability of news consumers to filter the content that comes their way reduces the likelihood of unplanned, unexpected encounters that represent shared experiences in an otherwise heterogeneous society.